Lance's sorry, laughable effort

Insincere ... did Armstrong's confession satisfy you? Source: George Burns / AAP

Insincere, evasive and self-serving.

Lance Armstrong's gamble to take the road to redemption via an Oprah Winfrey interview rather than through a recognised anti-doping authority was always fraught with danger.

While admitting - without requisite detail - to using performance-enhancing drugs, chronic lying and bullying, Armstrong was frugal with crucial information.

Bizarrely passing himself off as anything but the ringleader of an operation condemned as the most sophisticated in the history of sports, Armstrong attempted the soft sell.

It was laughable. And pathetic.

Armstrong's ploy of confessing to being a long-term fraud - an indisputable status based on US Anti-Doping Agency testimony - but avoiding nastier personal allegations was signature behaviour.

When in doubt, attack. Take the high moral ground, where there is none.

A massive online commentariat monitoring Winfrey's so-so inquistion exploded with rage over the holes Armstrong was allowed to amble through.

It was classic Armstrong manipulation.

He contrived a victim mentality to Winfrey's questioning, attributing his own viciousness to an impoverished childhood.

He shaped to justify drug use - testosterone in particular - as a salve to his ordeal with testicular cancer.

He challenged irony by describing himself as lacking credibility, admitting to constantly lying - yet wanting to be the "first man in the door" at a truth and reconciliation meeting.

Please.

And he poured chilling light on his shockingly insensitive dealings with Betsy Andreu and Emma O'Reilly, apparently aloof to their scarring from his vilification.

When Armstrong apologised for the damage he has caused to cycling, aspiring Olympians everywhere would have recoiled in horror.

There was a single, and constant, refrain in everything Armstrong uttered to Winfrey.

He is sorry only because he got caught.

He is not sorry about deep-seated damage he has wreaked.

Armstrong's enemies aren't in the least bit surprised by his latest performance.

He has always been a control freak and, by throwing himself on Winfrey's bountiful mercies, he was subjecting himself to nothing more testing than the equivalent of a cold shower.

After decades of lying and cheating to becoming the world's most famous athlete, Armstrong has not yet mastered two things.

He still is not comfortable with the truth, if ever knew what that is. And he remains a moral invertebrate, incapable of deciphering right from wrong.

If nothing else, the Winfrey interview showed that Armstrong is an unreconstructed thug.

He had the chance to do the just thing by co-operating with USADA last year.

But, as with virtually everything in his flawed existence, Armstrong opted to gamble.

He has lost badly - and, judging by the landslide weight of opinion against him in the Twitterverse - few people are crying over his demise.

Part two of Oprah's interview with Armstrong will be shown live in Australia on the Discovery Channel on Foxtel Saturday at 1PM AEDT. 

Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

Lance's sorry, laughable effort

Dengan url

http://ikhlasngeblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/lances-sorry-laughable-effort.html

Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

Lance's sorry, laughable effort

namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

Lance's sorry, laughable effort

sebagai sumbernya